Member question: Councillor R Mogford, received 18 May 2018
Subject: Membership shares
As the Leader of NCC, do you believe that it is morally unacceptable and indeed would represent a clear conflict-of-interest for any elected councillors, including cabinet members, to own membership shares in private companies part owned by Newport City Council?
With regard to the Norse Joint Venture Company, the only shares are owned by Newport City Council and Norse Commercial Services Limited. There are no other shareholders and none of the shares can be transferred to another party.
You have not identified any other specific companies to which your question relates. The only other company in which the council owns shares is Newport Transport and that is 100% owned by the council. Other collaborative companies with neighbouring local authorities, such as the EAS, are all guarantee companies with no share capital.
The rules on local authority companies would prohibit members of the public (and individual councillors and cabinet members) from holding any shares.
Therefore, I am not aware of any situation where councillors could own share in private companies part-owned by the council, so your question is academic. Issued 4 June 2018
Member question: Councillor M Evans, received 18 May 2018
Subject: Appointment to outside bodies
The Conservative group accepts there will be inevitably be a degree of political input into appointments for outside bodies. But can you explain and justify appointing 3 unelected Labour party activists to the Williams Trust in Caerleon before an elected councillor for the ward?
I note that the Conservative group accepts there will be inevitably be a degree of political input into appointments for outside bodies. Indeed, in 2008-12, the (then) Conservative/Liberal Democrat alliance removed Labour party members from school governing bodies, as well as other outside bodies. Since then, successive Labour administrations have allocated a number of appointments on outside bodies to the opposition groups, even though there is no requirement to do so.
However, in the case of the Williams Trust in Caerleon, this is an educational trust, not a school governing body and, therefore, it was decided that the existing trustees should be allowed to continue to serve their full term of office for the sake of continuity. Elected councillors are only given priority for school governing body appointments in their wards. Issued 30 May 2018
Member question: Councillor D Fouweather, received 21 May 2018
Subject: Questions time limit
At full council meetings only ten minutes is allocated to ask questions to cabinet members. Therefore it is likely that there would only be enough time for one question. I am sure you would agree that this is simply not enough time and therefore would you look into the possibility of extending the time limit?
As was outlined in the response to Cllr Mogford’s similar request to extend the time for Leader’s questions at Council (answer published 4 May 2018), both the time allocation and protocol for questions have been approved by full Council and set out clearly in standing orders.
The ten minute limit only refers to the time allocated for asking and responding to questions orally. As stated under Standing Order 4.3.i) –
If Members are unable to ask their question orally within the allocated time, remaining questions will be answered in writing.
Therefore the question is still answered and published as oral questions would be.
Members also have the right, under standing orders, to put questions to Cabinet Members at any time (as you have done here), so there is no need to wait until the next council meeting.
I therefore see no need to change this at the present time. Issued 29 May 2018
Member question: Councillor C Townsend, received 9 April 2018
Subject: Update on Knowledge Quarter project
Further to the meetings that are being held with both the University of South Wales and Coleg Gwent, could the Leader provide to council an update of the Knowledge Quarter project? I appreciate that talks/meetings are on-going, but would like to know where we are with this.
Council officers continue to work with colleagues from the University of South Wales and Coleg Gwent to develop an outline business case for the project, which will form the basis of Coleg Gwent’s funding application to Welsh Government.
Clearly, this is currently work in progress, but further information will be shared as the project progresses and more detail is available. Issued 23 April 2018
Member question: Councillor R. Mogford, received 19 March 2018
Subject: Questions to Leader (15 minutes)
As councillors we are all aware of this administration aspiring to the principles of democracy and indeed until quite recently the desire to get branding recognition for Newport as a City (no less) of Democracy.
Now as a great positive, while attending full council, I and no doubt the majority of the chamber are impressed by the agenda item where we get an update from a senior member of the police and how professionally the officer on the spot handles the session which includes a multitude of unrehearsed questions and comments from councillors cross the chamber.
This session lasts for a full 30 minutes and answers are always clear, targeted and precise, in my view.
This brings me to the agenda item: Questions to the Leader (15 minutes) and the associated protocol. My question then in short is:
Does the Leader feel that after a number of opportunities over the last year of facing questions from the floor now is the time to both extend the 15 min session which is clearly inadequate and, although it is not stated in standing orders, would the Leader consider the benefits of giving 'crisper', targeted answers to questions raised thus also allowing more questions to be aired while still providing the full and relevant response that each question deserves?
Dear Councillor Mogford
The time allocated for Leader’s question time and the protocol for asking questions have been approved by full Council and are set out in Standing Orders.
The 15 minutes allocated is more than adequate, in my view, to allow pertinent questions and a full response. Therefore, it is not appropriate to change this at the present time. I would also remind you that members still have the right, under Standing Orders, to put written questions at any time (as you have done on this occasion) and they do not have to wait until the next Council meeting – unlike the police question time. Issued 4 April 2018
Member question: Councillor Chris Evans, received 13 November 2017
Subject: Council pension fund investment
Please see correspondence below from a Rogerstone neighbour with regards to our council's pension fund investment into fossil fuels, could you please answer:
- Do you agree that the council should divest its pension fund from fossil fuels and reinvest in ways that benefits the community?
- What steps are the council taking to end fossil fuel investments and invest responsibly?
E mail question in full:
I am writing to you as your constituent to express my concern about the investments of our council pension fund in fossil fuel companies and to ask you to support the divestment of the fund.
A new report (http://gofossilfree.org/uk/fuellingthefire) shows that across the UK council-managed pension funds are investing more £16 billion in oil, coal and gas companies. These investments undermine local and national efforts to address climate change, and represent an unacceptable financial risk to pension-holders.
Two years ago, world governments signed the Paris Agreement – pledging to curb emissions and limit global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees. But the actions of fossil fuel companies like Shell and BP are pushing us far beyond this vital climate threshold.
Since 2015, the world has experienced the warmest year ever recorded and 2017 has brought devastating extreme weather events. Further extraction and burning of fossil fuels is not compatible with tackling climate change, and investing in fossil fuels is deeply irresponsible.
These investments also represent a serious financial risk to council pension funds. The value of fossil fuel companies is based on their reserves, and ability to burn them. But if global climate targets are going to be met, these reserves are ‘unburnable’ (https://goo.gl/EU3F95).
Leading financial experts, including the Governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney, have highlighted the risks of fossil fuels becoming ‘stranded assets’ and the danger which this poses to funds which continue to invest in them.
Council pension funds should be invested in the long-term interests of their members but they are not well served by risky investments which are driving climate change. Instead, councils could be investing in ways that benefit the local community – like renewable energy infrastructure and green social housing.
Fossil fuel divestment is a practical, legal and responsible way for pension funds to respond to climate change and address financial risk. Over 800 institutions around the world have made divestment commitments, including council pension funds in the UK like Southwark and Waltham Forest.
Local councillors have significant power over the investment decisions of the Local Government Pension Scheme.
The Greater Gwent (Torfaen) Pension Fund is managed by Torfaen County Borough Council and they have recently issued a press statement regarding their investment practices, which in summary states:
We (The Greater Gwent (Torfaen) Pension Fund ) agree this is an important area and we’re pleased to know that the fund we’re in takes it seriously and has taken steps to look at current practices and policies and its fund managers are required to comply with international principles for responsible investing.
We’re satisfied that they are taking appropriate steps which shows their commitment to this area.
As pension funds merge in the future, the influence of these combined, bigger funds can only strengthen in this respect.
The Fund uses a number of fund managers who rigorously review all investments to ensure they are financially strong and their business plans and strategies are robust in going forward.
Issued 22 November 2017
Member question: Councillor M Evans, received 18 October 2017
Subject: Decision for use of Welsh Government grant monies
I received the following reply from the head of service regarding a grant from Welsh Government:
The draft settlement across Wales included a notional amount of £3m (£142k for Newport) to support a city centre parking pilot initiative. This is not a specific grant and as it has come through the RSG, is un-hypothecated, i.e., is not ring fenced for a specific purpose. Due to the poor final settlement, a cash reduction of 0.43%, and significant pressures in other areas of the council, this was utilised to fund existing services.
Can you tell me who took this decision to fund existing services rather than support a city centre parking pilot initiative, and when this decision was taken?
No formal decision was made on this and the issue was not flagged up for a formal decision with members because it was not made clear at the time of the settlement and budget setting that this issue was required to be funded and therefore a formal decision was required.
It was not included as any formal ‘new responsibility’ or a new ‘specific grant, for example, which are the normal routes for new initiatives.
It is only as the year has progressed that this has become clearer as updates have been requested from WG on this issue. It does not detract from the fact that it for authorities individually to decide on the allocation of the budget funded from RSG.
The CM for Streetscene will now formally review the matter with the head of streetscene and decide what, if any, work is required on the matter here in Newport. Issued 27 October 2017
Member question: Councillor M Evans, received 26 July 2017
Subject: Chinese lanterns
RSPCA Cymru has been running a campaign on banning the use of sky lanterns also known as Chinese Lanterns, from council owned land. Their latest newsletter, which I think all members received, has stated that this council is one of only five councils left in Wales to put in place such a ban. Would the Leader of the council support a cross party motion following the majority of Wales and prohibiting the release of these lanterns in Newport?
In response to your question, the Leader of the council is aware of the issues regarding these lanterns and would have no objection to you formally tabling a motion at Council to prohibit their release from council land. This could then be the subject of an open debate and a free vote.
However, she has been advised that the decision to impose such a ban would be a matter for the Executive and Council could only make a recommendation to Cabinet for consideration. Because the final decision would need to be taken by Cabinet, it would not be appropriate at this stage for the Leader or any of her Cabinet colleagues to formally second the motion to Council. Issued 10 August 2017
Member question: Councillor Jordan, received 13 June 2017
Subject: UEFA Championship Final
With reference to the UEFA Championship final which was held in Cardiff a few weeks ago could you please answer me a few questions.
1) Why didn’t Newport City Council get involved with this tournament to have a fan zone in Newport?
2) Why wasn’t there an opportunity for Newport to make some money out of this event?
Dear Councillor Jordan
UEFA’s preferred model for fan interaction is the development of an associated festival, as provided in Cardiff Bay, rather than the traditional concept of fan zones i.e. where live TV coverage of the game is viewed by large congregations of fans. You will note that the men’s final was not even broadcasted live within Cardiff.
Such large scale events do provide benefit to the wider area, particularly in the hospitality sector, including hotel bookings/occupation. As a council we also ensure that key visitor/event venues have information about where to eat and visit, to encourage local spend.
The Championship League Final was supported by Welsh Government, and in line with their rigorous approach to reviewing such events, we will have access to their full evaluation when completed. We look forward to digesting that information, feeding back into the process, and adopting lessons learnt in the delivery and support of future events. Issued 27 June 2017
Member question: Councillor Kellaway, received 15 June 2017
Subject: Impact of major events on local businesses
Regarding the effect of major activities such as the Champions League final, NATO summit etc on local businesses. Whilst it is wonderful that these are coming to Wales indeed Newport, does this council realise the effect on businesses when the police advise people not to travel in the area? On the Saturday afternoon of the champions league, business was practically non- existent, in Llanwern village.
The upcoming Velothon in July will present business with yet another challenge.
Will you please carry out meaningful consultation with all local businesses so these events are seen as opportunities and not another day when they will simply be losing income which could push them over the edge.
Please be assured that as a council, we always endeavour to consider both the return on investment, wider benefits for the city and the impact on residents, communities and businesses.
It is important to note that many of these events are not organised by the council but we do work with the event organisers to ensure we maximise the benefits and minimise disruption.
For example, for this year’s Velothon we have worked closely with the event organisers at the early stages to reduce the length of time roads were closed and improve the communication with those directly affected along the route.
We also work closely with the major events department at Welsh Government who has rigorous assessment and review processes regarding returns in place to address exactly these issues. Not only are these things given full consideration prior to such events, they are evaluated in-depth in order determine whether future support will be given.
With large-scale events such as Nato, one of the main benefits was showing that Newport has the ability, infrastructure and energy to host truly global events. Hosting the 2014 Nato summit enhanced the city’s reputation for event excellence and gave the city international exposure. We have already seen how this has triggered further investment from a wide variety of sectors and has acted as a catalyst for the development of the International Convention Centre.
Specialists within the council also work to mitigate any impact on businesses.
For example, we ask that event organisers provide links to local information on their websites so that visitors are aware of our businesses and facilities. We ensure that key visitor/event venues have information about where to eat and visit, to encourage local spend.
This year, extra effort has been made to engage with businesses ahead of the Velothon with event organisers attending trade forums to speak to local businesses. This not only ensures local businesses are better informed, but provides opportunity for them to feed ideas and opinions directly to the event organisers.
We also work with local attractions, supporting them to connect with the media affiliated with such high-prolife events, therefore further raising their profile to wide audiences.
We do appreciate that not everyone will benefit from all events, but the general aim is they add to the city’s offering, attract visitors and support, in the long-term, our ongoing economic growth. Issued 26 June 2017
Member question: Councillor K Whitehead, received 1 June 2017
Subject: Standing Orders for council questions
Thank you for your recent reply to my question below, and further belated congratulations on your official appointment as leader of our great city, Newport Independents look forward to working with you constructively over the next five years. We passionately believe that 'full council' meetings need progressive reform with open questions to cabinet members and, your good self as leader, you'll also recall that at the Hustings you gave a commitment to introduce 'open questions' at full council adding 'you can ask me anything' so we are asking that you alter standing orders accordingly in time to be agreed at the next full council meeting, as we've stated previously it's interesting to note that this promise did not appear in Newport Labours manifesto, the statement 'you can ask me anything' also indicates Newport Labour will allow public questions at full council so we further request that standing orders are amended to accommodate this change. We’re proud to have included the idea of open questions in The Newport Independents Party Vision:
Public questions will be allowed and encouraged at full council.
Open questions to leader/ cabinet will be allowed and we will keep questions ‘at any time’ where cabinet members and the leader can be asked a written question at anytime.
We will encourage the people of Newport to petition the council on the issues they care about. Petitions with more than 500 local signatures from Newport residents will be debated in full council.
Further to the above suggestions, can we further request that standing orders are amended so that petitions with over 500 signatures are automatically placed on the agenda of full council for debate.
We share your vision of Newport becoming a city of democracy but feel we should begin by firstly becoming more truly democratic.
Thank you for your question. As you have stated, I made a clear commitment during the election to introduce open questions to the Leader at Council, and a report will be presented to Council on 25 July 2017, proposing the necessary changes to standing orders so that we can introduce this.
We have no plans currently to introduce direct questions from the public at Council meetings. As an administration we are committed to openness and transparency in all our business, but we believe that there are more appropriate avenues for this kind of public engagement. For example, the facility already exists for members of the public to suggest issues and topics directly to the scrutiny committees for consideration. In putting together my new Cabinet, I have given my Cabinet Member for Community and Resources, Cllr Mayer, specific responsibility for public engagement, and I have tasked him with exploring how we can interact more effectively with residents, and promote and develop the available channels of communication.
The protocol for petitions was last reviewed and agreed by Democratic Services Committee in February 2015. This report was made and agreed in direct response to specific issues that arose around the receipt of petitions at the Civic Centre, in order to clarify that process. It did not specifically address petitions to Council, or deal with the question of e-petitions. We now have the capability to deal with e-petitions through our modern.gov software. I propose requesting that the Democratic Services Committee reviews the approach to petitions, to explore and make recommendations on these points. Issued 16 June 2017
Member question: Councillor M Evans, received 13 June 2017
Subject: Sale of Friars Walk
In the recent press release sent out about the sale of Friars Walk you stated that you “welcomed the deal which will ensure the council can repay the loan it took out to finance the scheme in full.”
Can you confirm whether or not the proceeds of the deal will cover the repayment of the loan in full, or if there is a shortfall how much this is ?
Member Question: Councillor C Evans, received 12 June 2017
Subject: Sale of Friars Walk
With reference to the recent sale of Friars Walk, a neighbour in Rogerstone has raised the following questions:
- How much was Friars Walk sold for?
Further, with regards to the statement: “The council will have a continuing financial interest in the scheme through a small share in the rental income that will bring benefits to the city for many years to come.”
- What is the exact figure NCC will get from ‘future rental income’ of units? How is this structured, and for how many years?
- Will the income from rental units be back dated?
Given the sale has been completed and in the interests of being open and accountable there should be no commercial sensitivity in making the above public.
Can I also thank any officers or councillors who have been involved in the process for their contribution.
Thank you for your question. The sale of Friars Walk will be the subject of a public report to Cabinet, scheduled for July. This report will set out the details of the sale, and will be open for all to view. Issued 13 June 2017
Member question: Councillor C Townsend, received 18 May 2017
Subject: Newport Transport
As the principal shareholder of Newport Transport Ltd, will the Leader of the council outline her commitment to having regular meetings and active dialogue between the council and the company?
Since becoming Leader of Newport City Council in May 2016 I initiated a series of regular meetings with the Managing Director, his senior team and the Chair of the Board of Newport Transport. Our senior officers also meet and engage with Newport Transport officers on a regular basis. Both the Chief Executive and I have attended the Board’s recent AGM and I intend to continue in this manner to ensure that active dialogue takes place thus fulfilling my commitment as one of the principal shareholders of the company. Issued 1 June 2017